Key Differences
In short — Core i3-14100F outperforms Celeron 3965U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-14100F is 2561 days newer than Celeron 3965U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3965U
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-14100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-14100F
- Performs up to 274% better in Immortals of Aveum than Celeron 3965U - 86 vs 23 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3965U - 8 vs 2 threads
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron 3965U
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2017
Core i3-14100F
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 3965U | vs | Intel Core i3-14100F |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel BGA 1356 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
| 15 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 22.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
