Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9940X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9940X is 1783 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 95% cheaper than Core i9-9940X - $46.41 vs $870.7
- Up to 94% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i9-9940X - $0.1 vs $1.54 per FPS
- Consumes up to 68% less energy than Intel Core i9-9940X - 53 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-9940X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9940X
- Performs up to 26% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Celeron G1820 - 565 vs 448 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 28 vs 2 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
448
79.29203539823008%
Value, $/FPS
$0.1/FPS
100%
Price, $
$46.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $46.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350036 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
565
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.54/FPS
6.493506493506494%
Price, $
$870.7
5%
FPS Winner
Buy for $870.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350037 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Single-Core
491
33.65318711446196%
Multi-Core
825
7.685858021240917%
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | Intel Core i9-9940X |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 14 |
2 | Threads | 28 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 165 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |