Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 1703 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 64% cheaper than Core i5-10400F - $39.95 vs $112.53
- Up to 54% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Core i5-10400F - $0.28 vs $0.61 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i5-10400F - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 26% better in Dirt 5 than Celeron G3900 - 183 vs 145 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
145
79.23497267759562%
Value, $/FPS
$0.28/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $39.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349344 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
183
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.61/FPS
45.9016393442623%
Price, $
$112.53
35%
FPS Winner
Buy for $112.53 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349345 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
40.403337969401946%
Multi-Core
992
17.249174056685792%
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |