Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X is 1638 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 94% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X - $50.0 vs $899.99
- Up to 93% better value when playing World of Tanks than Ryzen 9 7950X - $0.1 vs $1.53 per FPS
- Consumes up to 68% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X - 54 vs 170 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
- Performs up to 16% better in World of Tanks than Celeron G4900 - 590 vs 509 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 32 vs 2 threads
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
509
86.27118644067797%
Value, $/FPS
$0.1/FPS
100%
Price, $
$50
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $50 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 363272 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
590
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.53/FPS
6.535947712418301%
Price, $
$899.99
5%
FPS Winner
Buy for $899.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 363272 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
616
20.966643975493533%
Multi-Core
1051
5.447571658114342%
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 170 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 45.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |