Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-7100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-7100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 1848 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-7100.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 28% better in Dirt 5 than Core i3-7100 - 222 vs 174 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100
- Up to 26% cheaper than Core i3-12100F - $70.0 vs $94.98
- Up to 7% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Core i3-12100F - $0.4 vs $0.43 per FPS
- Consumes up to 12% less energy than Intel Core i3-12100F - 51 vs 58 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-12100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
222
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.43/FPS
93.0232558139535%
Price, $
$94.98
73%
FPS Winner
Buy for $94.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349517 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
174
78.37837837837837%
Value, $/FPS
$0.4/FPS
100%
Price, $
$70
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349518 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
1247
56.044943820224724%
Multi-Core
2440
32.720933351213624%
Intel Core i3-12100F | vs | Intel Core i3-7100 |
---|---|---|
Jan 25th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
58 W | TDP | 51 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |