Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900 outperforms Core i3-14100F on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900 and Core i3-14100F have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900
- Performs up to 4% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i3-14100F - 231 vs 223 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-14100F - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-14100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Core i3-14100F
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Core i9-14900
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-14100F
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Single-Core
2492
84.58927359131026%
Multi-Core
8380
52.82733404778415%
Intel Core i3-14100F | vs | Intel Core i9-14900 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Raptor Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 24 |
| 8 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| 4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
| Not Available | TDP | Not Available |
| 10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
