Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 8840U outperforms Core i3-3217U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 8840U is 4205 days newer than Core i3-3217U.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3217U
- Consumes up to 39% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 8840U - 17 vs 28 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 8840U
- Performs up to 19% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i3-3217U - 223 vs 188 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3217U - 16 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Core i3-3217U
Mobile • Jun 1st, 2012
Ryzen 7 8840U
Mobile • Dec 6th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-3217U
Mobile • Jun 1st, 2012
Single-Core
289
11.541533546325878%
Multi-Core
608
6.937471474212688%
Intel Core i3-3217U | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 8840U |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Dec 6th, 2023 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Not Available |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AMD Socket FP8 |
Mobile | Segment | Mobile |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 16 |
| 1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 28 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 4 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
| Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 780M |
| No | Overclockable | No |
