Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7945HX outperforms Core i3-3217U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7945HX is 3869 days newer than Core i3-3217U.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3217U
- Consumes up to 69% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX - 17 vs 55 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
- Performs up to 52% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i3-3217U - 132 vs 87 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3217U - 32 vs 4 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-3217U
Mobile • Jun 1st, 2012
Ryzen 9 7945HX
Mobile • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-3217U
Mobile • Jun 1st, 2012
Single-Core
289
10.582204320761626%
Multi-Core
608
3.861298107455862%
Intel Core i3-3217U | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Dragon Range |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AMD Socket FL1 |
Mobile | Segment | Mobile |
| 2 | Cores | 16 |
| 4 | Threads | 32 |
| 1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 55 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 610M |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
