Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3220 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3220 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900 is 3785 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3220.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220
- Up to 79% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7900 - $79.0 vs $368.99
- Up to 74% better value when playing Elden Ring than Ryzen 9 7900 - $0.71 vs $2.69 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7900 - 55 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7900
- Performs up to 23% better in Elden Ring than Core i3-3220 - 137 vs 111 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220 - 24 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
111
81.02189781021897%
Value, $/FPS
$0.71/FPS
100%
Price, $
$79
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348795 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
FPS
137
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.69/FPS
26.394052044609666%
Price, $
$368.99
21%
FPS Winner
Buy for $368.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348796 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
525
18.590651558073652%
Multi-Core
1085
6.480320133787254%
Intel Core i3-3220 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 14th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |