Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms Core i3-3227U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 3656 days newer than Core i3-3227U.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3227U
- Consumes up to 89% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 17 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 48% better in Battlefield V than Core i3-3227U - 298 vs 202 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3227U - 32 vs 4 threads
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-3227U
Mobile • Jan 8th, 2013
Core i9-13900KS
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3227U | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KS |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 8th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2023 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 24 |
| 4 | Threads | 32 |
| 1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 150 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 19.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
