Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3960X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3240 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is 2639 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3240.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240
- Up to 97% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - $41.0 vs $1300.0
- Up to 97% better value when playing Stray than Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - $0.23 vs $7.03 per FPS
- Consumes up to 80% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - 55 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
- Performs up to 5% better in Stray than Core i3-3240 - 185 vs 177 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240 - 48 vs 4 threads
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
177
95.67567567567568%
Value, $/FPS
$0.23/FPS
100%
Price, $
$41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 363432 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
185
100%
Value, $/FPS
$7.03/FPS
3.2716927453769555%
Price, $
$1300
3%
FPS Winner
Buy for $1,300 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 363433 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
554
33.23335332933413%
Multi-Core
1137
8.537958999774723%
Intel Core i3-3240 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket TRX4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 48 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 280 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |