Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3240 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 3431 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3240.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240
- Up to 57% cheaper than Core i3-12100F - $41.0 vs $94.98
- Up to 50% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i3-12100F - $0.26 vs $0.52 per FPS
- Consumes up to 5% less energy than Intel Core i3-12100F - 55 vs 58 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-12100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 17% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i3-3240 - 181 vs 155 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240 - 8 vs 4 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
155
85.6353591160221%
Value, $/FPS
$0.26/FPS
100%
Price, $
$41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349397 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
181
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.52/FPS
50%
Price, $
$94.98
43%
FPS Winner
Buy for $94.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349397 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
554
24.898876404494384%
Multi-Core
1137
15.247418532922087%
Intel Core i3-3240 | vs | Intel Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 58 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |