Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3240 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900 is 3410 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3240.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240
- Up to 91% cheaper than Core i9-12900 - $41.0 vs $458.0
- Up to 90% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i9-12900 - $0.26 vs $2.48 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900 - 55 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900
- Performs up to 19% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i3-3240 - 185 vs 155 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240 - 24 vs 4 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
155
83.78378378378379%
Value, $/FPS
$0.26/FPS
100%
Price, $
$41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349515 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
185
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.48/FPS
10.483870967741936%
Price, $
$458
8%
FPS Winner
Buy for $458 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349515 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
554
22.401940962393855%
Multi-Core
1137
8.716651333946643%
Intel Core i3-3240 | vs | Intel Core i9-12900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |