Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900F outperforms Core i3-4000M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900F is 3044 days newer than Core i3-4000M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4000M
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-12900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900F
- Performs up to 14% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i3-4000M - 192 vs 168 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4000M - 24 vs 4 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i3-4000M
Mobile • Sep 4th, 2013
Core i9-12900F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-4000M
Mobile • Sep 4th, 2013
Single-Core
709
27.924379677038203%
Multi-Core
1427
10.2735781137509%
Intel Core i3-4000M | vs | Intel Core i9-12900F |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 4th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Haswell | Codename | Alder Lake |
| Intel Socket G3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 16 |
| 4 | Threads | 24 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
| 37 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
