Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms Core i3-4010U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 3501 days newer than Core i3-4010U.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4010U
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 8% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Core i3-4010U - 241 vs 224 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4010U - 32 vs 4 threads
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-4010U
Mobile • Jun 4th, 2013
Core i9-13900F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-4010U
Mobile • Jun 4th, 2013
Single-Core
520
19.047619047619047%
Multi-Core
1079
6.2663337011440845%
Intel Core i3-4010U | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 4th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Haswell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 24 |
| 4 | Threads | 32 |
| 1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
| 15 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 17.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
