Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4130 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4130 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 2433 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4130.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4130
- Up to 62% cheaper than Core i5-10400F - $43.0 vs $112.53
- Up to 59% better value when playing Need For Speed Unbound than Core i5-10400F - $0.32 vs $0.79 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i5-10400F - 54 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 7% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Core i3-4130 - 142 vs 133 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4130 - 12 vs 4 threads
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
133
93.66197183098592%
Value, $/FPS
$0.32/FPS
100%
Price, $
$43
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349158 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
142
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.79/FPS
40.50632911392405%
Price, $
$112.53
38%
FPS Winner
Buy for $112.53 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349157 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
995
69.19332406119611%
Multi-Core
1960
34.081029386193705%
Intel Core i3-4130 | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |