Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4130 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4130 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600 is 2433 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4130.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4130
- Up to 86% cheaper than Core i5-10600 - $43.0 vs $299.95
- Up to 85% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i5-10600 - $0.27 vs $1.76 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600 - 54 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600
- Performs up to 6% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i3-4130 - 170 vs 161 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4130 - 12 vs 4 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
161
94.70588235294117%
Value, $/FPS
$0.27/FPS
100%
Price, $
$43
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349404 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
170
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.76/FPS
15.340909090909092%
Price, $
$299.95
14%
FPS Winner
Buy for $299.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349403 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
995
63.01456618112729%
Multi-Core
1960
31.74089068825911%
Intel Core i3-4130 | vs | Intel Core i5-10600 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |