Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4130 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4130 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 2753 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4130.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4130
- Up to 73% cheaper than Core i5-11600KF - $43.0 vs $160.68
- Up to 68% better value when playing Need For Speed Unbound than Core i5-11600KF - $0.32 vs $1.01 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600KF - 54 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 20% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Core i3-4130 - 159 vs 133 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4130 - 12 vs 4 threads
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
133
83.64779874213836%
Value, $/FPS
$0.32/FPS
100%
Price, $
$43
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349162 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
159
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.01/FPS
31.683168316831683%
Price, $
$160.68
26%
FPS Winner
Buy for $160.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349161 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
995
45.309653916211296%
Multi-Core
1960
22.51062363615482%
Intel Core i3-4130 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |