Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7920X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4130 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4130 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-7920X is 1470 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4130.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4130
- Up to 86% cheaper than Core i9-7920X - $43.0 vs $299.0
- Up to 85% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-7920X - $0.24 vs $1.61 per FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i9-7920X - 54 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-7920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7920X
- Performs up to 4% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-4130 - 186 vs 179 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4130 - 24 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
179
96.23655913978494%
Value, $/FPS
$0.24/FPS
100%
Price, $
$43
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349515 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
FPS
186
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.61/FPS
14.906832298136644%
Price, $
$299
14%
FPS Winner
Buy for $299 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349515 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
995
72.94721407624634%
Multi-Core
1960
21.53372885080202%
Intel Core i3-4130 | vs | Intel Core i9-7920X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 10th, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 140 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |