Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600K is 2191 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4150.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150
- Up to 67% cheaper than Core i5-10600K - $48.0 vs $143.72
- Up to 63% better value when playing Need For Speed Unbound than Core i5-10600K - $0.36 vs $0.98 per FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600K - 54 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600K
- Performs up to 10% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Core i3-4150 - 147 vs 134 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4150 - 12 vs 4 threads
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
134
91.15646258503402%
Value, $/FPS
$0.36/FPS
100%
Price, $
$48
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349164 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
147
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.98/FPS
36.734693877551024%
Price, $
$143.72
33%
FPS Winner
Buy for $143.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349163 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Single-Core
1041
62.78648974668275%
Multi-Core
2047
29.935653699912258%
Intel Core i3-4150 | vs | Intel Core i5-10600K |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |