Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 7 2700 outperforms the more expensive Core i3-4150T on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 7 2700 is 1449 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-4150T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 2700 - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 2700 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700
- Performs up to 1% better in Stray than Core i3-4150T - 182 vs 180 FPS
- Up to 16% cheaper than Core i3-4150T - $185.0 vs $219.95
- Up to 16% better value when playing Stray than Core i3-4150T - $1.02 vs $1.22 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4150T - 16 vs 4 threads
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
180
98.9010989010989%
Value, $/FPS
$1.22/FPS
83.60655737704919%
Price, $
$219.95
84%
Buy for $219.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 359808 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
182
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.02/FPS
100%
Price, $
$185
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $185 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 359810 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Single-Core
856
76.84021543985638%
Multi-Core
1742
31.736199672071415%
Intel Core i3-4150T | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700 |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Haswell | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |