Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — FX-4300 outperforms the more expensive Core i3-540 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing FX-4300 is 1020 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-540.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-540
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than AMD FX-4300 - 73 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Performs up to 0% better in Battlefield V than Core i3-540 - 207 vs 206 FPS
- Up to 47% cheaper than Core i3-540 - $48.02 vs $90.0
- Up to 48% better value when playing Battlefield V than Core i3-540 - $0.23 vs $0.44 per FPS
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
FPS
206
99.51690821256038%
Value, $/FPS
$0.44/FPS
52.27272727272727%
Price, $
$90
53%
Buy for $90 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350050 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
207
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.23/FPS
100%
Price, $
$48.02
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $48.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350050 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-540 | vs | AMD FX-4300 |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Clarkdale | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
73 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |