Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-540 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-540 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900F is 4086 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-540.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-540
- Up to 62% cheaper than Core i9-11900F - $90.0 vs $240.0
- Up to 51% better value when playing Need For Speed Unbound than Core i9-11900F - $0.74 vs $1.52 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 31% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Core i3-540 - 158 vs 121 FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Core i3-540 - 65 vs 73 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-540 - 16 vs 4 threads
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
FPS
121
76.58227848101265%
Value, $/FPS
$0.74/FPS
100%
Price, $
$90
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $90 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349278 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
158
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.52/FPS
48.68421052631579%
Price, $
$240
37%
FPS Winner
Buy for $240 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349279 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-540 | vs | Intel Core i9-11900F |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Clarkdale | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
73 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |