Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-7100 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen 7 2700 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-7100 is 471 days older than the more expensive Ryzen 7 2700.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100
- Performs up to 1% better in Valheim than Ryzen 7 2700 - 199 vs 197 FPS
- Up to 62% cheaper than Ryzen 7 2700 - $70.0 vs $185.0
- Up to 63% better value when playing Valheim than Ryzen 7 2700 - $0.35 vs $0.94 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 2700 - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 2700 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100 - 16 vs 4 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
199
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.35/FPS
100%
Price, $
$70
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348916 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
197
98.99497487437185%
Value, $/FPS
$0.94/FPS
37.234042553191486%
Price, $
$185
37%
Buy for $185 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348916 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-7100 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |