Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-7100 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-6900K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-7100 is 217 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-6900K.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100
- Up to 52% cheaper than Core i7-6900K - $70.0 vs $145.0
- Up to 52% better value when playing Valheim than Core i7-6900K - $0.35 vs $0.73 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than Intel Core i7-6900K - 51 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6900K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6900K
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100 - 16 vs 4 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349037 minutes ago
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
199
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.73/FPS
47.94520547945205%
Price, $
$145
48%
Buy for $145 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349037 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
1247
99.60063897763578%
Multi-Core
2440
34.27929193593706%
Intel Core i3-7100 | vs | Intel Core i7-6900K |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Broadwell-E |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |