Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-7100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-7100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 2093 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-7100.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100
- Up to 87% cheaper than Core i9-13900K - $70.0 vs $522.99
- Up to 84% better value when playing God of War than Core i9-13900K - $0.41 vs $2.63 per FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900K - 51 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 16% better in God of War than Core i3-7100 - 199 vs 172 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100 - 32 vs 4 threads
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
172
86.4321608040201%
Value, $/FPS
$0.41/FPS
100%
Price, $
$70
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349035 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
199
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.63/FPS
15.5893536121673%
Price, $
$522.99
13%
FPS Winner
Buy for $522.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349034 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
1247
41.930060524546064%
Multi-Core
2440
12.110383164582093%
Intel Core i3-7100 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900K |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |