Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-4690K outperforms the more expensive Core i3-8100 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-4690K is 1221 days older than the more expensive Core i3-8100.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8100
- Consumes up to 26% less energy than Intel Core i5-4690K - 65 vs 88 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4690K
- Performs up to 1% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-8100 - 185 vs 184 FPS
- Up to 51% cheaper than Core i3-8100 - $53.5 vs $110.0
- Up to 52% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-8100 - $0.29 vs $0.6 per FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
184
99.45945945945947%
Value, $/FPS
$0.6/FPS
48.333333333333336%
Price, $
$110
48%
Buy for $110 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349396 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
FPS
185
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.29/FPS
100%
Price, $
$53.5
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $53.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349396 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Single-Core
1245
96.73659673659674%
Multi-Core
3405
93.77581933351694%
Intel Core i3-8100 | vs | Intel Core i5-4690K |
---|---|---|
Oct 5th, 2017 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2014 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 88 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |