Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms Core i3-8300T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 1738 days newer than Core i3-8300T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8300T
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 22% better in No Man's Sky than Core i3-8300T - 207 vs 170 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8300T - 32 vs 4 threads
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-8300T
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Core i9-13900F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-8300T
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Single-Core
1155
42.30769230769231%
Multi-Core
3357
19.495905685579885%
Intel Core i3-8300T | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 24 |
| 4 | Threads | 32 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
| 35 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
