Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-9100F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen 7 2700X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-9100F is 369 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen 7 2700X.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Performs up to 1% better in Overwatch 2 than Ryzen 7 2700X - 347 vs 344 FPS
- Up to 45% cheaper than Ryzen 7 2700X - $115.0 vs $210.0
- Up to 46% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Ryzen 7 2700X - $0.33 vs $0.61 per FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 2700X - 65 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 16 vs 4 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
347
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.33/FPS
100%
Price, $
$115
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $115 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348802 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
344
99.13544668587896%
Value, $/FPS
$0.61/FPS
54.09836065573771%
Price, $
$210
54%
Buy for $210 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348802 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-9100F | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700X |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |