Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms Core i5-10210U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 1232 days newer than Core i5-10210U.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10210U
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 25% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-10210U - 158 vs 126 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10210U - 32 vs 8 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Core i5-10210U
Mobile • Aug 21st, 2019
Core i9-13900F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10210U | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 21st, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 24 |
| 8 | Threads | 32 |
| 1.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| 4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
| 15 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 16.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
