Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-10400F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2950X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-10400F is 608 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2950X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 2% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - 132 vs 130 FPS
- Up to 90% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - $112.53 vs $1075.0
- Up to 90% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - $0.85 vs $8.27 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400F - 32 vs 12 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
132
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.85/FPS
100%
Price, $
$112.53
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $112.53 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349943 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
FPS
130
98.48484848484848%
Value, $/FPS
$8.27/FPS
10.278113663845225%
Price, $
$1075
10%
Buy for $1,075 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349943 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
Single-Core
1263
87.83031988873435%
Multi-Core
8338
100%
Intel Core i5-10400F | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Comet Lake | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 16 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |