Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12600 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12600 is 635 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Up to 53% cheaper than Core i5-12600 - $112.53 vs $239.99
- Up to 48% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i5-12600 - $0.85 vs $1.63 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12600
- Performs up to 11% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i5-10400F - 147 vs 132 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
132
89.79591836734694%
Value, $/FPS
$0.85/FPS
100%
Price, $
$112.53
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $112.53 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349633 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
147
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.63/FPS
52.14723926380368%
Price, $
$239.99
46%
FPS Winner
Buy for $239.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349632 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1438
60.64951497258541%
Multi-Core
5751
59.16058018722353%
Intel Core i5-10400F | vs | Intel Core i5-12600 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 12 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | No |