Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-10400F outperforms the more expensive Core i5-3550 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-10400F is 2923 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-3550.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 31% better in War Thunder than Core i5-3550 - 182 vs 139 FPS
- Up to 66% cheaper than Core i5-3550 - $112.53 vs $335.0
- Up to 74% better value when playing War Thunder than Core i5-3550 - $0.62 vs $2.41 per FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i5-3550 - 65 vs 77 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3550 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3550
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
182
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.62/FPS
100%
Price, $
$112.53
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $112.53 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348503 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
139
76.37362637362637%
Value, $/FPS
$2.41/FPS
25.72614107883817%
Price, $
$335
33%
Buy for $335 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348502 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Single-Core
639
44.43671766342142%
Multi-Core
1896
32.968179447052684%
Intel Core i5-10400F | vs | Intel Core i5-3550 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 77 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |