Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-10400F outperforms the more expensive Core i7-3820 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-10400F is 2999 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-3820.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 32% better in War Thunder than Core i7-3820 - 182 vs 138 FPS
- Up to 65% cheaper than Core i7-3820 - $112.53 vs $319.88
- Up to 73% better value when playing War Thunder than Core i7-3820 - $0.62 vs $2.32 per FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Core i7-3820 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3820 - 12 vs 8 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
182
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.62/FPS
100%
Price, $
$112.53
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $112.53 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348504 minutes ago
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
FPS
138
75.82417582417582%
Value, $/FPS
$2.32/FPS
26.724137931034488%
Price, $
$319.88
35%
Buy for $319.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348503 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
Single-Core
617
42.90681502086231%
Multi-Core
2299
39.97565640758129%
Intel Core i5-10400F | vs | Intel Core i7-3820 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Feb 13th, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge E |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 130 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |