Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900F outperforms Core i5-10400H on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900F is 642 days newer than Core i5-10400H.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400H
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-12900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900F
- Performs up to 17% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-10400H - 153 vs 131 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400H - 24 vs 8 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Core i5-10400H
Mobile • Apr 2nd, 2020
Core i9-12900F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10400H | vs | Intel Core i9-12900F |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 2nd, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 16 |
| 8 | Threads | 24 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
| 4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
| 45 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
UHD Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
