Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-9400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-9400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600 is 478 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-9400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600
- Performs up to 2% better in Elden Ring than Core i5-9400F - 123 vs 121 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400F - 12 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Up to 63% cheaper than Core i5-10600 - $112.0 vs $299.95
- Up to 62% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i5-10600 - $0.93 vs $2.44 per FPS
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
123
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.44/FPS
38.114754098360656%
Price, $
$299.95
37%
FPS Winner
Buy for $299.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348736 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
121
98.3739837398374%
Value, $/FPS
$0.93/FPS
100%
Price, $
$112
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $112 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348736 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Single-Core
1378
87.27042431918936%
Multi-Core
4834
78.2834008097166%
Intel Core i5-10600 | vs | Intel Core i5-9400F |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 6 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |