Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11400 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-9700F on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11400 is 693 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-9700F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400
- Performs up to 5% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-9700F - 199 vs 190 FPS
- Up to 61% cheaper than Core i7-9700F - $150.95 vs $389.88
- Up to 63% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-9700F - $0.76 vs $2.05 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-9700F - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-9700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
199
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.76/FPS
100%
Price, $
$150.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $150.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348551 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
190
95.47738693467338%
Value, $/FPS
$2.05/FPS
37.07317073170732%
Price, $
$389.88
38%
Buy for $389.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348551 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Single-Core
1549
79.84536082474227%
Multi-Core
6256
85.6986301369863%
Intel Core i5-11400 | vs | Intel Core i7-9700F |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |