Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11500 outperforms the cheaper FX-8120 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8120 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11500 is 3443 days newer than the cheaper FX-8120.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11500
- Performs up to 16% better in Elden Ring than FX-8120 - 128 vs 110 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8120 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8120 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8120 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8120
- Up to 64% cheaper than Core i5-11500 - $78.02 vs $218.99
- Up to 58% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i5-11500 - $0.71 vs $1.71 per FPS
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
128
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.71/FPS
41.52046783625731%
Price, $
$218.99
35%
FPS Winner
Buy for $218.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349038 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
110
85.9375%
Value, $/FPS
$0.71/FPS
100%
Price, $
$78.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $78.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349037 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11500 | vs | AMD FX-8120 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 15.5x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |