Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-11600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-11600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900F and the cheaper Core i5-11600 have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600
- Up to 38% cheaper than Core i9-11900F - $150.0 vs $240.0
- Up to 37% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i9-11900F - $0.84 vs $1.33 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 1% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i5-11600 - 180 vs 179 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11600 - 16 vs 12 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
179
99.44444444444444%
Value, $/FPS
$0.84/FPS
100%
Price, $
$150
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $150 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349404 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
180
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.33/FPS
63.1578947368421%
Price, $
$240
62%
FPS Winner
Buy for $240 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349404 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Single-Core
2122
97.74297558728696%
Multi-Core
8188
89.28143059644532%
Intel Core i5-11600 | vs | Intel Core i9-11900F |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |