Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-540 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-540 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 4086 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-540.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 31% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Core i3-540 - 158 vs 121 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-540 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-540
- Up to 55% cheaper than Core i5-11600K - $90.0 vs $198.9
- Up to 41% better value when playing Need For Speed Unbound than Core i5-11600K - $0.74 vs $1.26 per FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 73 vs 125 Watts
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
158
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.26/FPS
58.730158730158735%
Price, $
$198.9
45%
FPS Winner
Buy for $198.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349042 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
FPS
121
76.58227848101265%
Value, $/FPS
$0.74/FPS
100%
Price, $
$90
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $90 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349042 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600K | vs | Intel Core i3-540 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 7th, 2010 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Clarkdale |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 73 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |