Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11600K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-9400 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11600K is 879 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-9400.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 51% better in Immortals of Aveum than Core i5-9400 - 77 vs 51 FPS
- Up to 18% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Core i5-9400 - $2.58 vs $3.16 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400 - 12 vs 6 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400
- Up to 19% cheaper than Core i5-11600K - $160.91 vs $198.9
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
77
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.58/FPS
100%
Price, $
$198.9
80%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $198.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348794 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
51
66.23376623376623%
Value, $/FPS
$3.16/FPS
81.64556962025317%
Price, $
$160.91
100%
Buy for $160.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348794 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Single-Core
1384
63.31198536139067%
Multi-Core
4795
55.89229513929362%
Intel Core i5-11600K | vs | Intel Core i5-9400 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 6 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | UHD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |