Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11600KF outperforms the more expensive Core i9-10850K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 232 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-10850K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 3% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i9-10850K - 142 vs 138 FPS
- Up to 44% cheaper than Core i9-10850K - $160.68 vs $286.0
- Up to 45% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i9-10850K - $1.13 vs $2.07 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10850K
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11600KF - 20 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
142
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.13/FPS
100%
Price, $
$160.68
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $160.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348608 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
FPS
138
97.1830985915493%
Value, $/FPS
$2.07/FPS
54.589371980676326%
Price, $
$286
56%
Buy for $286 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348608 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600KF | vs | Intel Core i9-10850K |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
12 | Threads | 20 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |