Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12400 is 614 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400
- Performs up to 5% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i5-10400F - 142 vs 135 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Up to 26% cheaper than Core i5-12400 - $112.53 vs $153.0
- Up to 23% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i5-12400 - $0.83 vs $1.08 per FPS
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
142
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.08/FPS
76.85185185185183%
Price, $
$153
73%
FPS Winner
Buy for $153 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348738 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
135
95.07042253521126%
Value, $/FPS
$0.83/FPS
100%
Price, $
$112.53
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $112.53 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348738 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1438
65.99357503441946%
Multi-Core
5751
65.00508646998982%
Intel Core i5-12400 | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 12 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |