Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-12400 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-3820 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-12400 is 3613 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-3820.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400
- Performs up to 19% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-3820 - 204 vs 171 FPS
- Up to 52% cheaper than Core i7-3820 - $153.0 vs $319.88
- Up to 60% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-3820 - $0.75 vs $1.87 per FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Core i7-3820 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3820 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-3820 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
204
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.75/FPS
100%
Price, $
$153
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $153 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348740 minutes ago
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
FPS
171
83.82352941176471%
Value, $/FPS
$1.87/FPS
40.106951871657756%
Price, $
$319.88
47%
Buy for $319.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348739 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
Single-Core
617
28.315741165672325%
Multi-Core
2299
25.986210014694244%
Intel Core i5-12400 | vs | Intel Core i7-3820 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Feb 13th, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge E |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 130 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |