Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-12400 outperforms the more expensive Core i9-9960X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-12400 is 1173 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-9960X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400
- Performs up to 11% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i9-9960X - 146 vs 131 FPS
- Up to 90% cheaper than Core i9-9960X - $153.0 vs $1579.0
- Up to 91% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i9-9960X - $1.05 vs $12.05 per FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i9-9960X - 65 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-9960X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9960X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12400 - 32 vs 12 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
146
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.05/FPS
100%
Price, $
$153
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $153 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350297 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
131
89.72602739726028%
Value, $/FPS
$12.05/FPS
8.71369294605809%
Price, $
$1579
9%
Buy for $1,579 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350297 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-12400 | vs | Intel Core i9-9960X |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 16 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 165 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |