Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7845HX outperforms Core i5-12400F on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7845HX is 365 days newer than Core i5-12400F.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX
- Performs up to 7% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i5-12400F - 130 vs 121 FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i5-12400F - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12400F - 24 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-12400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-12400F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Ryzen 9 7845HX
Mobile • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-12400F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Single-Core
2191
82.7416918429003%
Multi-Core
8910
64.701183646794%
Intel Core i5-12400F | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Alder Lake | Codename | Dragon Range |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket FL1 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
| 6 | Cores | 12 |
| 12 | Threads | 24 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
| 4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
| 65 W | TDP | 55 W |
| 10 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 610M |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
