Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400F outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 3960X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-12400F is 771 days newer than Ryzen Threadripper 3960X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400F
- Performs up to 6% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - 204 vs 193 FPS
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - 65 vs 280 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12400F - 48 vs 12 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
193
94.6078431372549%
Value, $/FPS
$6.74/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1300
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $1,300 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348740 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Single-Core
1667
76.08397991784574%
Multi-Core
13317
100%
Intel Core i5-12400F | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Alder Lake | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket TRX4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
12 | Threads | 48 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 280 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |