Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400F outperforms Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-12400F is 1372 days newer than Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400F
- Performs up to 16% better in Elden Ring than Celeron G4900 - 130 vs 112 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i5-12400F - 54 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-12400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
112
86.15384615384616%
Value, $/FPS
$0.45/FPS
100%
Price, $
$50
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $50 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349098 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
616
28.115015974440894%
Multi-Core
1051
11.795735129068461%
Intel Core i5-12400F | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Alder Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 54 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |