Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12600K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4370 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4370 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12600K is 2663 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4370.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12600K
- Performs up to 14% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-4370 - 210 vs 184 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4370 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4370
- Up to 56% cheaper than Core i5-12600K - $82.8 vs $187.99
- Up to 50% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-12600K - $0.45 vs $0.9 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i5-12600K - 54 vs 125 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for $187.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348670 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
FPS
184
87.61904761904762%
Value, $/FPS
$0.45/FPS
100%
Price, $
$82.8
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $82.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348671 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Single-Core
1220
49.795918367346935%
Multi-Core
2407
20.412143826322932%
Intel Core i5-12600K | vs | Intel Core i3-4370 |
---|---|---|
Nov 4th, 2021 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 54 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |