Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms Core i5-13400E on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900F and Core i5-13400E have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400E
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 12% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i5-13400E - 227 vs 203 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-13400E - 32 vs 16 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Core i5-13400E
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Core i9-13900F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-13400E
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Single-Core
1325
48.53479853479853%
Multi-Core
8823
51.239909402404315%
Intel Core i5-13400E | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Raptor Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 10 | Cores | 24 |
| 16 | Threads | 32 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| 4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
| 65 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
